We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 49 |
A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar. |
49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | clear |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 132 |
Sequential compactness and the axiom of choice, Brunner, N. 1983b, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
132 \(\Rightarrow\) 342-n | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
49: | Order Extension Principle: Every partial ordering can be extended to a linear ordering. Tarski [1924], p 78. |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
132: | \(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. |
342-n: | (For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).) \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): Every infinite family of \(n\)-element sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. (See Form 166.) |
Comment: