Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

60 \(\Rightarrow\) 108
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
60 \(\Rightarrow\) 5 clear
5 \(\Rightarrow\) 38 Non-constructive properties of the real numbers, Howard, P. 2001, Math. Logic Quart.
38 \(\Rightarrow\) 108 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
60:

\(C(\infty,WO)\): Every set of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function.
Moore, G. [1982], p 125.

5:

\(C(\aleph_0,\aleph_0,\Bbb R)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty denumerable subsets of \({\Bbb R}\) has a choice function.

38:

\({\Bbb R}\) is not the union of a countable family of countable sets.

108:

There is an ordinal \(\alpha\) such that \(2^{\aleph _{\alpha}}\) is not the union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets.

Comment:

Back