We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
31 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 |
L’axiome de M. Zermelo et son rˆole dans la th´eorie des ensembles et l’analyse, Sierpi'nski, W. 1918, Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie Cl. Math. Nat. |
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 357 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
31: | \(UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0})\): The countable union theorem: The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is denumerable. |
32: | \(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets has a choice function. |
357: | \(KW(\aleph_0,\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of denumerable sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) of denumerable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
Comment: