Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

31 \(\Rightarrow\) 10
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
31 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 L’axiome de M. Zermelo et son rˆole dans la th´eorie des ensembles et l’analyse, Sierpi'nski, W. 1918, Bull. Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie Cl. Math. Nat.
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
31:

\(UT(\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0},\aleph_{0})\): The countable union theorem:  The union of a denumerable set of denumerable sets is denumerable.

32:

\(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets  has a choice function.

10:

\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

Comment:

Back