We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
231 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 | clear |
32 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
231: | \(UT(WO,WO,WO)\): The union of a well ordered collection of well orderable sets is well orderable. |
32: | \(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets has a choice function. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
Comment: