We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 7 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 | 
							 	On the existence of large sets of Dedekind cardinals, Tarski,  A. 1965, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.  The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 161 problem 11.6  | 
					
| 9 \(\Rightarrow\) 336-n | clear | 
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 7: | There is no infinite decreasing sequence of cardinals.  | 
					
| 9: | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.  | 
					
| 336-n: | (For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).) For every infinite set \(X\), there is an infinite \(Y \subseteq X\) such that the set of all \(n\)-element subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function.  | 
					
Comment: