We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 231 \(\Rightarrow\) 32 | clear |
| 32 \(\Rightarrow\) 350 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 231: | \(UT(WO,WO,WO)\): The union of a well ordered collection of well orderable sets is well orderable. |
| 32: | \(C(\aleph_0,\le\aleph_0)\): Every denumerable set of non-empty countable sets has a choice function. |
| 350: | \(MC(\aleph_0,\aleph_0)\): For every denumerable set \(X\) of non-empty denumerable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\). |
Comment: