We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
36 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 |
On Loeb and weakly Loeb Hausdorff spaces, Tachtsis, E. 2000, Math. Japon. |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 132 |
Sequential compactness and the axiom of choice, Brunner, N. 1983b, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
132 \(\Rightarrow\) 73 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
36: | Compact T\(_2\) spaces are Loeb. (A space is Loeb if the set of non-empty closed sets has a choice function.) |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
132: | \(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. |
73: | \(\forall n\in\omega\), \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): For every \(n\in\omega\), if \(C\) is an infinite family of \(n\) element sets, then \(C\) has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b] |
Comment: