Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

36 \(\Rightarrow\) 12
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
36 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 On Loeb and weakly Loeb Hausdorff spaces, Tachtsis, E. 2000, Math. Japon.
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 clear
378 \(\Rightarrow\) 11 clear
11 \(\Rightarrow\) 12 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
36:

Compact T\(_2\) spaces are Loeb. (A space is Loeb if the set of non-empty closed sets has a choice function.)

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

378:

Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets:  For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function.

11:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\), \(A\) has an infinite subset \(B\) such that for every \(n\in\omega\), \(n>0\), the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

12:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\) and every \(n\in\omega\), there is an infinite subset \(B\) of \(A\) such the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco} [1998b]

Comment:

Back