We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
44 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 120 theorem 8.1 |
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 355 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
44: | \(DC(\aleph _{1})\): Given a relation \(R\) such that for every subset \(Y\) of a set \(X\) with \(|Y| < \aleph_{1}\) there is an \(x \in X\) with \(Y \mathrel R x\), then there is a function \(f: \aleph_{1} \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\beta < \aleph_{1}) (\{f(\gamma ): \gamma < b \} \mathrel R f(\beta))\). |
39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202. |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
355: | \(KW(\aleph_0,\infty)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
Comment: