Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

40 \(\Rightarrow\) 421
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 clear
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 421 Unions and the axiom of choice, De-la-Cruz-Hall-Howard-Keremedis-Rubin-2002B[2002B], Math. Logic Quart.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
40:

\(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.

39:

\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.

8:

\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):

421:   \(UT(\aleph_0,WO,WO)\): The union of a denumerable set of well orderable sets can be well ordered.

Comment:

Back