Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

260 \(\Rightarrow\) 378
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
260 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 clear
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888]
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 376 clear
376 \(\Rightarrow\) 377 Weak choice principles, De la Cruz, O. 1998a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
377 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
260:

\(Z(TR\&C,P)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every partially ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.

40:

\(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.

39:

\(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.

8:

\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):

9:

Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.

376:

Restricted Kinna Wagner Principle:  For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for every \(z\subseteq Y\), if \(|z| \ge 2\) then \(f(z)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(z\).

377:

Restricted Ordering Principle:  For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that \(Y\) can be linearly ordered.

378:

Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets:  For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function.

Comment:

Back