We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
347 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 |
Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa, M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | clear |
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 | Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888] |
9 \(\Rightarrow\) 304 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
347: | Idemmultiple Partition Principle: If \(y\) is idemmultiple (\(2\times y\approx y\)) and \(x\precsim ^* y\), then \(x\precsim y\). |
40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202. |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
9: | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite. |
304: | There does not exist a \(T_2\) topological space \(X\) such that every infinite subset of \(X\) contains an infinite compact subset. |
Comment: