We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
286 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | S´eminaire d’Analyse 1992, Morillon, 1991b, |
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | clear |
39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 379 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
286: | Extended Krein-Milman Theorem: Let K be a quasicompact (sometimes called convex-compact), convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space, then K has an extreme point. H. Rubin/J. Rubin [1985], p. 177-178. |
40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202. |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
379: | \(PKW(\infty,\infty,\infty)\): For every infinite family \(X\) of sets each of which has at least two elements, there is an infinite subfamily \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in Y\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(y\). |
Comment: