We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
426 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 |
On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications. |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 355 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
426: | If \((X,\cal T) \) is a first countable topological space and \((\cal B(x))_{x\in X}\) is a family such that for all \(x \in X\), \(\cal B(x)\) is a local base at \(x\), then there is a family \(( \cal V(x))_{x\in X}\) such that for every \(x \in X\), \(\cal V(x)\) is a countable local base at \(x\) and \(\cal V(x) \subseteq \cal B(x)\). |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
355: | \(KW(\aleph_0,\infty)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). |
Comment: