We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 202 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | clear | 
| 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 39 | clear | 
| 39 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 | clear | 
| 8 \(\Rightarrow\) 9 | 								Was sind und was sollen die Zollen?, Dedekind, [1888] | 
					
| 9 \(\Rightarrow\) 82 | clear | 
| 82 \(\Rightarrow\) 387 | 
							 	"Dense orderings, partitions, and weak forms of choice", Gonzalez,  C. 1995a, Fund. Math.  | 
					
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 202: | \(C(LO,\infty)\): Every linearly ordered family of non-empty sets has a choice function.  | 
					
| 40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.  | 
					
| 39: | \(C(\aleph_{1},\infty)\): Every set \(A\) of non-empty sets such that \(\vert A\vert = \aleph_{1}\) has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p. 202.  | 
					
| 8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):  | 
					
| 9: | Finite \(\Leftrightarrow\) Dedekind finite: \(W_{\aleph_{0}}\) Jech [1973b]: \(E(I,IV)\) Howard/Yorke [1989]): Every Dedekind finite set is finite.  | 
					
| 82: | \(E(I,III)\) (Howard/Yorke [1989]): If \(X\) is infinite then \(\cal P(X)\) is Dedekind infinite. (\(X\) is finite \(\Leftrightarrow {\cal P}(X)\) is Dedekind finite.)  | 
					
| 387: | DPO: Every infinite set has a non-trivial, dense partial order. (A partial ordering \(<\) on a set \(X\) is dense if \((\forall x, y\in X)(x \lt y \to (\exists z \in X)(x \lt z \lt y))\) and is non-trivial if \((\exists x,y\in X)(x \lt y)\)).  | 
					
Comment: