We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
426 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 |
On first and second countable spaces and the axiom of choice, Gutierres, G 2004, Topology and its Applications. |
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 379 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
426: | If \((X,\cal T) \) is a first countable topological space and \((\cal B(x))_{x\in X}\) is a family such that for all \(x \in X\), \(\cal B(x)\) is a local base at \(x\), then there is a family \(( \cal V(x))_{x\in X}\) such that for every \(x \in X\), \(\cal V(x)\) is a countable local base at \(x\) and \(\cal V(x) \subseteq \cal B(x)\). |
8: | \(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\): |
379: | \(PKW(\infty,\infty,\infty)\): For every infinite family \(X\) of sets each of which has at least two elements, there is an infinite subfamily \(Y\) of \(X\) and a function \(f\) such that for all \(y\in Y\), \(f(y)\) is a non-empty proper subset of \(y\). |
Comment: