We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
286 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | S´eminaire d’Analyse 1992, Morillon, 1991b, |
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 43 |
Consistency results for $ZF$, Jensen, R.B. 1967, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. |
43 \(\Rightarrow\) 42 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
286: | Extended Krein-Milman Theorem: Let K be a quasicompact (sometimes called convex-compact), convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space, then K has an extreme point. H. Rubin/J. Rubin [1985], p. 177-178. |
40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
43: | \(DC(\omega)\) (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If \(S\) is a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\) then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\). See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136. |
42: | Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem: If a countable family of first order sentences is satisfiable in a set \(M\) then it is satisfiable in a countable subset of \(M\). (See Moore, G. [1982], p. 251 for references. |
Comment: