We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

202 \(\Rightarrow\) 375
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
202 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 clear
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 43 Consistency results for $ZF$, Jensen, R.B. 1967, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.
On cardinals and their successors, Jech, T. 1966a, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S'er. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys.
43 \(\Rightarrow\) 375

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
202:

\(C(LO,\infty)\): Every linearly ordered family of non-empty sets has  a choice function.

40:

\(C(WO,\infty)\):  Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325.

43:

\(DC(\omega)\) (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If \(S\)  is  a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\)  then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\).  See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136.

375:

Tietze-Urysohn Extension Theorem: If \((X,T)\) is a normal topological space, \(A\) is closed in \(X\), and \(f: A\to [0,1]\) is continuous, then there exists a continuous function \(g: X\to [0,1]\) which extends \(f\).

Comment:

Back