We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
286 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | S´eminaire d’Analyse 1992, Morillon, 1991b, |
40 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 | clear |
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 327 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
286: | Extended Krein-Milman Theorem: Let K be a quasicompact (sometimes called convex-compact), convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space, then K has an extreme point. H. Rubin/J. Rubin [1985], p. 177-178. |
40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
122: | \(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
327: | \(KW(WO,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of finite sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.) |
Comment: