We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
| Implication | Reference |
|---|---|
| 286 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | S´eminaire d’Analyse 1992, Morillon, 1991b, |
| 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 165 | clear |
| 165 \(\Rightarrow\) 324 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
|---|---|
| 286: | Extended Krein-Milman Theorem: Let K be a quasicompact (sometimes called convex-compact), convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space, then K has an extreme point. H. Rubin/J. Rubin [1985], p. 177-178. |
| 40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. |
| 165: | \(C(WO,WO)\): Every well ordered family of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function. |
| 324: | \(KW(WO,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of well orderable sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of well orderable sets, there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.) |
Comment: