We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
			
| Implication | Reference | 
|---|---|
| 347 \(\Rightarrow\) 40 | Partition principles and infinite sums of cardinal numbers, Higasikawa,  M. 1995, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic | 
| 40 \(\Rightarrow\) 231 | Abzählbarkeit und Wohlordenbarkeit, Felgner,  U. 1974, Comment. Math. Helv. | 
| 231 \(\Rightarrow\) 151 | clear | 
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
| Howard-Rubin Number | Statement | 
|---|---|
| 347: | Idemmultiple Partition Principle: If \(y\) is idemmultiple (\(2\times y\approx y\)) and \(x\precsim ^* y\), then \(x\precsim y\). | 
| 40: | \(C(WO,\infty)\): Every well orderable set of non-empty sets has a choice function. Moore, G. [1982], p 325. | 
| 231: | \(UT(WO,WO,WO)\): The union of a well ordered collection of well orderable sets is well orderable. | 
| 151: | \(UT(WO,\aleph_{0},WO)\) (\(U_{\aleph_{1}}\)): The union of a well ordered set of denumerable sets is well orderable. (If \(\kappa\) is a well ordered cardinal, see note 27 for \(UT(WO,\kappa,WO)\).) | 
Comment: