We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

174-alpha \(\Rightarrow\) 362
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
174-alpha \(\Rightarrow\) 43 "Representing multi-algebras by algebras, the axiom of choice and the axiom of dependent choice", Howard, P. 1981, Algebra Universalis
43 \(\Rightarrow\) 8 clear
8 \(\Rightarrow\) 361 Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, page 325
361 \(\Rightarrow\) 362 Zermelo's Axiom of Choice, Moore, 1982, page 325

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
174-alpha:

\(RM1,\aleph_{\alpha }\): The representation theorem for multi-algebras with \(\aleph_{\alpha }\) unary operations:  Assume \((A,F)\) is  a  multi-algebra  with \(\aleph_{\alpha }\) unary operations (and no other operations). Then  there  is  an  algebra \((B,G)\)  with \(\aleph_{\alpha }\) unary operations and an equivalence relation \(E\) on \(B\) such that \((B/E,G/E)\) and \((A,F)\) are isomorphic multi-algebras.

43:

\(DC(\omega)\) (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If \(S\)  is  a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\)  then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\).  See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136.

8:

\(C(\aleph_{0},\infty)\):

361:

In \(\Bbb R\), the union of a denumerable number of analytic sets is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325.

362:

In \(\Bbb R\), every Borel set is analytic. G. Moore [1982], pp 181 and 325.

Comment:

Back