Axiom Of Choice

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

192 \(\Rightarrow\) 411 given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication	Reference
192 \(\Rightarrow\) 43	Injectivity, projectivity and the axiom of choice, Blass, A. 1979, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
43 \(\Rightarrow\) 411	Dependent Choice and Weak Compactness, Delhomme-Morillon-2000[2000], Notre Dame J. Formal Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number	Statement
192:	\(EP\) sets: For every set \(A\) there is a projective set \(X\) and a function from \(X\) onto \(A\).
43:	\(DC(\omega)\) (DC), Principle of Dependent Choices: If \(S\) is a relation on a non-empty set \(A\) and \((\forall x\in A) (\exists y\in A)(x S y)\) then there is a sequence \(a(0), a(1), a(2), \ldots\) of elements of \(A\) such that \((\forall n\in\omega)(a(n)\mathrel S a(n+1))\). See Tarski [1948], p 96, Levy [1964], p. 136.
411:	RCuc (Reflexive Compactness for uniformly convex Banach spaces): The closed unit ball of a uniformly convex Banach space is compact for the weak topology.

Comment:

Back