We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
49 \(\Rightarrow\) 30 | clear |
30 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 | clear |
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 88 | clear |
88 \(\Rightarrow\) 93 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 7 problem 10 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
49: | Order Extension Principle: Every partial ordering can be extended to a linear ordering. Tarski [1924], p 78. |
30: | Ordering Principle: Every set can be linearly ordered. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
61: | \((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
88: | \(C(\infty ,2)\): Every family of pairs has a choice function. |
93: | There is a non-measurable subset of \({\Bbb R}\). |
Comment: