Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

303 \(\Rightarrow\) 141
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
303 \(\Rightarrow\) 50 Some propositions equivalent to the Sikorski extension theorem for Boolean algebras, Bell, J.L. 1988, Fund. Math.
50 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar.
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 141 Generalizing Konigs infinity lemma, Cowen, R.H. 1977b, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
303:

If \(B\) is a Boolean algebra, \(S\subseteq B\) and \(S\) is closed under \(\land\), then there is a \(\subseteq\)-maximal proper ideal \(I\) of \(B\) such that \(I\cap S= \{0\}\).

50:

Sikorski's  Extension Theorem: Every homomorphism of a subalgebra \(B\) of a Boolean algebra \(A\) into a complete Boolean algebra \(B'\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B'\). Sikorski [1964], p. 141.

14:

BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal.

141:

[14 P(\(n\))] with \(n = 2\):  Let \(\{A(i): i\in I\}\) be a collection of sets such that \(\forall i\in I,\ |A(i)|\le 2\) and suppose \(R\) is a symmetric binary relation on \(\bigcup^{}_{i\in I} A(i)\) such that for all finite \(W\subseteq I\) there is an \(R\) consistent choice function for \(\{A(i): i \in W\}\). Then there is an \(R\) consistent choice function for \(\{A(i): i\in I\}\).

Comment:

Back