We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
303 \(\Rightarrow\) 50 |
Some propositions equivalent to the Sikorski extension theorem for Boolean algebras, Bell, J.L. 1988, Fund. Math. |
50 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar. |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 99 |
Variants of Rado's selection lemma and their applications, Rav, Y. 1977, Math. Nachr. |
99 \(\Rightarrow\) 225 |
Variants of Rado's selection lemma and their applications, Rav, Y. 1977, Math. Nachr. |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
303: | If \(B\) is a Boolean algebra, \(S\subseteq B\) and \(S\) is closed under \(\land\), then there is a \(\subseteq\)-maximal proper ideal \(I\) of \(B\) such that \(I\cap S= \{0\}\). |
50: | Sikorski's Extension Theorem: Every homomorphism of a subalgebra \(B\) of a Boolean algebra \(A\) into a complete Boolean algebra \(B'\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B'\). Sikorski [1964], p. 141. |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
99: | Rado's Selection Lemma: Let \(\{K(\lambda): \lambda \in\Lambda\}\) be a family of finite subsets (of \(X\)) and suppose for each finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a function \(\gamma(S): S \rightarrow X\) such that \((\forall\lambda\in S)(\gamma(S)(\lambda)\in K(\lambda))\). Then there is an \(f: \Lambda\rightarrow X\) such that for every finite \(S\subseteq\Lambda\) there is a finite \(T\) such that \(S\subseteq T\subseteq\Lambda\) and such that \(f\) and \(\gamma (T)\) agree on S. |
225: | Every proper filter on \(\omega\) can be extended to an ultrafilter. |
Comment: