We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
303 \(\Rightarrow\) 50 |
Some propositions equivalent to the Sikorski extension theorem for Boolean algebras, Bell, J.L. 1988, Fund. Math. |
50 \(\Rightarrow\) 14 |
A survey of recent results in set theory, Mathias, A.R.D. 1979, Period. Math. Hungar. |
14 \(\Rightarrow\) 63 | clear |
63 \(\Rightarrow\) 70 | clear |
70 \(\Rightarrow\) 206 | clear |
206 \(\Rightarrow\) 223 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
303: | If \(B\) is a Boolean algebra, \(S\subseteq B\) and \(S\) is closed under \(\land\), then there is a \(\subseteq\)-maximal proper ideal \(I\) of \(B\) such that \(I\cap S= \{0\}\). |
50: | Sikorski's Extension Theorem: Every homomorphism of a subalgebra \(B\) of a Boolean algebra \(A\) into a complete Boolean algebra \(B'\) can be extended to a homomorphism of \(A\) into \(B'\). Sikorski [1964], p. 141. |
14: | BPI: Every Boolean algebra has a prime ideal. |
63: |
\(SPI\): Weak ultrafilter principle: Every infinite set has a non-trivial ultrafilter.
|
70: | There is a non-trivial ultrafilter on \(\omega\). Jech [1973b], prob 5.24. |
206: | The existence of a non-principal ultrafilter: There exists an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal ultrafilter on \(X\). |
223: | There is an infinite set \(X\) and a non-principal measure on \(\cal P(X)\). |
Comment: