Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

259 \(\Rightarrow\) 19
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
259 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
51 \(\Rightarrow\) 25 Choice and cofinal well-ordered subsets, Morris, D.B. 1969, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.
25 \(\Rightarrow\) 34 clear
34 \(\Rightarrow\) 19 Sur les fonctions representables analytiquement, Lebesgue, H. 1905, J. Math. Pures Appl.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
259:

\(Z(TR\&C,W)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every well ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.

51:

Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering.  Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117.

25:

\(\aleph _{\beta +1}\) is regular for all ordinals \(\beta\).

34:

\(\aleph_{1}\) is regular.

19:

A real function is analytically representable if and only if it is in Baire's classification. G.Moore [1982], equation (2.3.1).

Comment:

Back