Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

259 \(\Rightarrow\) 294
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
259 \(\Rightarrow\) 51 Variations of Zorn's lemma, principles of cofinality, and Hausdorff's maximal principle, Part I and II, Harper, J. 1976, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic
51 \(\Rightarrow\) 294 Choice and cofinal well-ordered subsets, Morris, D.B. 1969, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
259:

\(Z(TR\&C,W)\): If \((X,R)\) is a transitive and connected relation in which every well ordered subset has an upper bound, then \((X,R)\) has a maximal element.

51:

Cofinality Principle: Every linear ordering has a cofinal sub well ordering.  Sierpi\'nski [1918], p 117.

294:

Every linearly ordered \(W\)-set is well orderable.

Comment:

Back