Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

52 \(\Rightarrow\) 280
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
52 \(\Rightarrow\) 142 The strength of the Hahn-Banach theorem, Pincus, D. 1972c, Lecture Notes in Mathematics
142 \(\Rightarrow\) 280 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
52:

Hahn-Banach Theorem:  If \(V\) is a real vector space and \(p: V \rightarrow {\Bbb R}\) satisfies \(p(x+y) \le p(x) + p(y)\) and \((\forall t > 0)( p(tx) = tp(x) )\) and \(S\) is a subspace of \(V\) and \(f:S \rightarrow {\Bbb R}\) is linear and satisfies \((\forall  x \in S)( f(x) \le  p(x) )\) then \(f\) can be extended to \(f^{*} : V \rightarrow {\Bbb R}\) such that \(f^{*}\) is linear and \((\forall x \in V)(f^{*}(x) \le p(x))\).

142:

\(\neg  PB\):  There is a set of reals without the property of Baire.  Jech [1973b], p. 7.

280:

There is a complete separable metric space with a subset which does not have the Baire property.

Comment:

Back