We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
60 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 132 |
Sequential compactness and the axiom of choice, Brunner, N. 1983b, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
60: |
\(C(\infty,WO)\): Every set of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
132: | \(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\): Every infinite family of finite sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. |
Comment: