We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
60 \(\Rightarrow\) 85 | clear |
85 \(\Rightarrow\) 349 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
60: |
\(C(\infty,WO)\): Every set of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function. |
85: | \(C(\infty,\aleph_{0})\): Every family of denumerable sets has a choice function. Jech [1973b] p 115 prob 7.13. |
349: | \(MC(\infty,\aleph_0)\): For every set \(X\) of non-empty denumerable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a finite, non-empty subset of \(x\). |
Comment: