Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

60 \(\Rightarrow\) 122
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
60 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
60:

\(C(\infty,WO)\): Every set of non-empty, well orderable sets has a choice function.
Moore, G. [1982], p 125.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

Comment:

Back