We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 | clear |
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 45-n | clear |
45-n \(\Rightarrow\) 64 |
Classes of Dedekind finite cardinals, Truss, J. K. 1974a, Fund. Math. |
64 \(\Rightarrow\) 390 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
61: | \((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
45-n: | If \(n\in\omega-\{0,1\}\), \(C(\infty,n)\): Every set of \(n\)-element sets has a choice function. |
64: | \(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.) |
390: | Every infinite set can be partitioned either into two infinite sets or infinitely many sets, each of which has at least two elements. Ash [1983]. |
Comment: