Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

218 \(\Rightarrow\) 18
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
218 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 clear
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 80 clear
80 \(\Rightarrow\) 18 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
218:

\((\forall n\in\omega - \{0\}) MC(\infty,\infty \), relatively prime to \(n\)): \(\forall n\in\omega -\{0\}\), if \(X\) is a set of non-empty sets, then  there  is  a function \(f\) such that for all \(x\in X\), \(f(x)\) is a non-empty, finite subset of \(x\) and \(|f(x)|\) is relatively prime to \(n\).

61:

\((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element  sets has a choice function.

80:

\(C(\aleph_{0},2)\):  Every denumerable set of  pairs has  a  choice function.

18:

\(PUT(\aleph_{0},2,\aleph_{0})\):  The union of a denumerable family of pairwise disjoint pairs has a denumerable subset.

Comment:

Back