Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

344 \(\Rightarrow\) 358
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
344 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 clear
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 clear
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 358 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
344:

If \((E_i)_{i\in I}\) is a family of non-empty sets, then there is a family \((U_i)_{i\in I}\) such that \(\forall i\in I\), \(U_i\) is an ultrafilter on \(E_i\).

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

10:

\(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\):  Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

358:

\(KW(\aleph_0,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a denumerable family of finite sets: For every denumerable set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\).

Comment:

Back