We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
323 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | note-70 |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 10 | clear |
10 \(\Rightarrow\) 80 | clear |
80 \(\Rightarrow\) 18 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
323: | \(KW(\infty,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a family of well orderable sets: For every set \(M\) of well orderable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.) |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
10: | \(C(\aleph_{0},< \aleph_{0})\): Every denumerable family of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
80: | \(C(\aleph_{0},2)\): Every denumerable set of pairs has a choice function. |
18: | \(PUT(\aleph_{0},2,\aleph_{0})\): The union of a denumerable family of pairwise disjoint pairs has a denumerable subset. |
Comment: