We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
344 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 | clear |
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 11 | clear |
11 \(\Rightarrow\) 12 | clear |
12 \(\Rightarrow\) 73 |
Weak choice principles, De la Cruz, O. 1998a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Set Theory: Techniques and Applications, De la Cruz/Di Prisco, 1998b, 47-70 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
344: | If \((E_i)_{i\in I}\) is a family of non-empty sets, then there is a family \((U_i)_{i\in I}\) such that \(\forall i\in I\), \(U_i\) is an ultrafilter on \(E_i\). |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
61: | \((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
11: | A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\), \(A\) has an infinite subset \(B\) such that for every \(n\in\omega\), \(n>0\), the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b] |
12: | A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\) and every \(n\in\omega\), there is an infinite subset \(B\) of \(A\) such the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco} [1998b] |
73: | \(\forall n\in\omega\), \(PC(\infty,n,\infty)\): For every \(n\in\omega\), if \(C\) is an infinite family of \(n\) element sets, then \(C\) has an infinite subfamily with a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b] |
Comment: