Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

270 \(\Rightarrow\) 111
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
270 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 Restricted versions of the compactness theorem, Kolany, A. 1991, Rep. Math. Logic
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 clear
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 250 clear
250 \(\Rightarrow\) 111 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
270:

\(CT_{\hbox{fin}}\): The compactness theorem for propositional logic restricted to sets of formulas in which each variable occurs only in a finite number of formulas.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

61:

\((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element  sets has a choice function.

250:

\((\forall n\in\omega-\{0,1\})(C(WO,n))\): For every natural number \(n\ge 2\), every well ordered family of \(n\) element sets has a choice function.

111:

\(UT(WO,2,WO)\): The union of an infinite well ordered set of 2-element sets is an infinite well ordered set.

Comment:

Back