We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
344 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | clear |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 61 | clear |
61 \(\Rightarrow\) 88 | clear |
88 \(\Rightarrow\) 142 | The Axiom of Choice, Jech, 1973b, page 7 problem 11 |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
344: | If \((E_i)_{i\in I}\) is a family of non-empty sets, then there is a family \((U_i)_{i\in I}\) such that \(\forall i\in I\), \(U_i\) is an ultrafilter on \(E_i\). |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
61: | \((\forall n\in\omega, n\ge 2\))\((C(\infty,n))\): For each \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\), every set of \(n\) element sets has a choice function. |
88: | \(C(\infty ,2)\): Every family of pairs has a choice function. |
142: | \(\neg PB\): There is a set of reals without the property of Baire. Jech [1973b], p. 7. |
Comment: