We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

409 \(\Rightarrow\) 132
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
409 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 Short proof of a theorem of Rado on graphs, Foster, B. L. 1964, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
note-152
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 132 Sequential compactness and the axiom of choice, Brunner, N. 1983b, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
409:

Suppose \((G,\Gamma)\) is a locally finite graph (i.e. \(G\) is a non-empty set and \(\Gamma\) is a function from \(G\) to \(\cal P(G)\) such that for each \(x\in G\), \(\Gamma(x)\) and \(\Gamma^{-1}\{x\}\) are finite), \(K\) is a finite set of integers, and \(T\) is a function mapping subsets of \(K\) into subsets of \(K\). If for each finite subgraph \((A,\Gamma_A)\) there is a function \(\psi\) such that for each \(x\in A\), \(\psi(x)\in T(\psi[\Gamma_A(x)])\), then there is a function \(\phi\) such that for all \(x\in G\), \(\phi(x)\in T(\phi[\Gamma(x)])\).

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

132:

\(PC(\infty, <\aleph_0,\infty)\):  Every infinite family of finite  sets has an infinite subfamily with a choice function.

Comment:

Back