We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
409 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 |
Short proof of a theorem of Rado on graphs, Foster, B. L. 1964, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. note-152 |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 308-p |
Maximal p-subgroups and the axiom of choice, Howard-Yorke-1987 [1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
409: | Suppose \((G,\Gamma)\) is a locally finite graph (i.e. \(G\) is a non-empty set and \(\Gamma\) is a function from \(G\) to \(\cal P(G)\) such that for each \(x\in G\), \(\Gamma(x)\) and \(\Gamma^{-1}\{x\}\) are finite), \(K\) is a finite set of integers, and \(T\) is a function mapping subsets of \(K\) into subsets of \(K\). If for each finite subgraph \((A,\Gamma_A)\) there is a function \(\psi\) such that for each \(x\in A\), \(\psi(x)\in T(\psi[\Gamma_A(x)])\), then there is a function \(\phi\) such that for all \(x\in G\), \(\phi(x)\in T(\phi[\Gamma(x)])\). |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
308-p: | If \(p\) is a prime and if \(\{G_y: y\in Y\}\) is a set of finite groups, then the weak direct product \(\prod_{y\in Y}G_y\) has a maximal \(p\)-subgroup. |
Comment: