We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
270 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 |
Restricted versions of the compactness theorem, Kolany, A. 1991, Rep. Math. Logic |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 308-p |
Maximal p-subgroups and the axiom of choice, Howard-Yorke-1987 [1987, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
270: | \(CT_{\hbox{fin}}\): The compactness theorem for propositional logic restricted to sets of formulas in which each variable occurs only in a finite number of formulas. |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
308-p: | If \(p\) is a prime and if \(\{G_y: y\in Y\}\) is a set of finite groups, then the weak direct product \(\prod_{y\in Y}G_y\) has a maximal \(p\)-subgroup. |
Comment: