We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
323 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 | note-70 |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 378 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
323: | \(KW(\infty,WO)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a family of well orderable sets: For every set \(M\) of well orderable sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A| > 1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.) |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
378: | Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets: For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function. |
Comment: