We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

409 \(\Rightarrow\) 122
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
409 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 Short proof of a theorem of Rado on graphs, Foster, B. L. 1964, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
note-152
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
409:

Suppose \((G,\Gamma)\) is a locally finite graph (i.e. \(G\) is a non-empty set and \(\Gamma\) is a function from \(G\) to \(\cal P(G)\) such that for each \(x\in G\), \(\Gamma(x)\) and \(\Gamma^{-1}\{x\}\) are finite), \(K\) is a finite set of integers, and \(T\) is a function mapping subsets of \(K\) into subsets of \(K\). If for each finite subgraph \((A,\Gamma_A)\) there is a function \(\psi\) such that for each \(x\in A\), \(\psi(x)\in T(\psi[\Gamma_A(x)])\), then there is a function \(\phi\) such that for all \(x\in G\), \(\phi(x)\in T(\phi[\Gamma(x)])\).

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

Comment:

Back