We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:
Implication | Reference |
---|---|
409 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 |
Short proof of a theorem of Rado on graphs, Foster, B. L. 1964, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. note-152 |
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 | clear |
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 | clear |
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 327 | clear |
Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:
Howard-Rubin Number | Statement |
---|---|
409: | Suppose \((G,\Gamma)\) is a locally finite graph (i.e. \(G\) is a non-empty set and \(\Gamma\) is a function from \(G\) to \(\cal P(G)\) such that for each \(x\in G\), \(\Gamma(x)\) and \(\Gamma^{-1}\{x\}\) are finite), \(K\) is a finite set of integers, and \(T\) is a function mapping subsets of \(K\) into subsets of \(K\). If for each finite subgraph \((A,\Gamma_A)\) there is a function \(\psi\) such that for each \(x\in A\), \(\psi(x)\in T(\psi[\Gamma_A(x)])\), then there is a function \(\phi\) such that for all \(x\in G\), \(\phi(x)\in T(\phi[\Gamma(x)])\). |
62: | \(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\): Every set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
121: | \(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
122: | \(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function. |
327: | \(KW(WO,<\aleph_0)\), The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of finite sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\) then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.) |
Comment: