Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

270 \(\Rightarrow\) 327
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
270 \(\Rightarrow\) 62 Restricted versions of the compactness theorem, Kolany, A. 1991, Rep. Math. Logic
62 \(\Rightarrow\) 121 clear
121 \(\Rightarrow\) 122 clear
122 \(\Rightarrow\) 327 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
270:

\(CT_{\hbox{fin}}\): The compactness theorem for propositional logic restricted to sets of formulas in which each variable occurs only in a finite number of formulas.

62:

\(C(\infty,< \aleph_{0})\):  Every set of non-empty finite  sets  has  a choice function.

121:

\(C(LO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every linearly ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

122:

\(C(WO,<\aleph_{0})\): Every well ordered set of non-empty finite sets has a choice function.

327:

\(KW(WO,<\aleph_0)\),  The Kinna-Wagner Selection Principle for a well ordered family of finite sets: For every well ordered set \(M\) of finite sets there is a function \(f\) such that for all \(A\in M\), if \(|A|>1\)  then \(\emptyset\neq f(A)\subsetneq A\). (See Form 15.)

Comment:

Back