Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

378 \(\Rightarrow\) 390
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
378 \(\Rightarrow\) 11 clear
11 \(\Rightarrow\) 12 clear
12 \(\Rightarrow\) 336-n clear
336-n \(\Rightarrow\) 64 Weak choice principles, De la Cruz, O. 1998a, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
64 \(\Rightarrow\) 390 clear

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
378:

Restricted Choice for Families of Well Ordered Sets:  For every infinite set \(X\) there is an infinite subset \(Y\) of \(X\) such that the family of non-empty well orderable subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function.

11:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\), \(A\) has an infinite subset \(B\) such that for every \(n\in\omega\), \(n>0\), the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco [1998b]

12:

A Form of Restricted Choice for Families of Finite Sets: For every infinite set \(A\) and every \(n\in\omega\), there is an infinite subset \(B\) of \(A\) such the set of all \(n\) element subsets of \(B\) has a choice function. De la Cruz/Di Prisco} [1998b]

336-n:

(For \(n\in\omega\), \(n\ge 2\).)  For every infinite set \(X\), there is an infinite \(Y \subseteq X\) such that the set of all \(n\)-element subsets of \(Y\) has a choice function.

64:

\(E(I,Ia)\) There are no amorphous sets. (Equivalently, every infinite set is the union of two disjoint infinite sets.)

390:

Every infinite set can be partitioned either into two infinite sets or infinitely many sets, each of which has at least two elements. Ash [1983].

Comment:

Back