Implications

We have the following indirect implication of form equivalence classes:

28-p \(\Rightarrow\) 309
given by the following sequence of implications, with a reference to its direct proof:

Implication Reference
28-p \(\Rightarrow\) 427 clear
427 \(\Rightarrow\) 67 clear
67 \(\Rightarrow\) 52 Independence of the prime ideal theorem from the Hahn Banach theorem, Pincus, D. 1972b, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
52 \(\Rightarrow\) 309 The Hahn-Banach theorem implies the Banach-Tarski paradox, Pawlikowski, J. 1991, Fund. Math.

Here are the links and statements of the form equivalence classes referenced above:

Howard-Rubin Number Statement
28-p:

(Where \(p\) is a prime) AL20(\(\mathbb Z_p\)): Every vector space \(V\) over \(\mathbb Z_p\) has the property that every linearly independent subset can be extended to a basis.  (\(\mathbb Z_p\) is the \(p\) element field.) Rubin, H./Rubin, J. [1985], p. 119, Statement AL20

427: \(\exists F\) AL20(\(F\)): There is a field \(F\) such that every vector space \(V\) over \(F\) has the property that every independent subset of \(V\) can be extended to a basis.  \ac{Bleicher} \cite{1964}, \ac{Rubin, H.\/Rubin, J \cite{1985, p.119, AL20}.
67:

\(MC(\infty,\infty)\) \((MC)\), The Axiom of Multiple Choice: For every set \(M\) of non-empty sets there is a function \(f\) such that \((\forall x\in M)(\emptyset\neq f(x)\subseteq x\) and \(f(x)\) is finite).

52:

Hahn-Banach Theorem:  If \(V\) is a real vector space and \(p: V \rightarrow {\Bbb R}\) satisfies \(p(x+y) \le p(x) + p(y)\) and \((\forall t > 0)( p(tx) = tp(x) )\) and \(S\) is a subspace of \(V\) and \(f:S \rightarrow {\Bbb R}\) is linear and satisfies \((\forall  x \in S)( f(x) \le  p(x) )\) then \(f\) can be extended to \(f^{*} : V \rightarrow {\Bbb R}\) such that \(f^{*}\) is linear and \((\forall x \in V)(f^{*}(x) \le p(x))\).

309:

The Banach-Tarski Paradox: There are three finite partitions \(\{P_1,\ldots\), \(P_n\}\), \(\{Q_1,\ldots,Q_r\}\) and \(\{S_1,\ldots,S_n, T_1,\ldots,T_r\}\) of \(B^3 = \{x\in {\Bbb R}^3 : |x| \le 1\}\) such that \(P_i\) is congruent to \(S_i\) for \(1\le i\le n\) and \(Q_i\) is congruent to \(T_i\) for \(1\le i\le r\).

Comment:

Back